Notice: curl_setopt(): CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST no longer accepts the value 1, value 2 will be used instead in /home/admin/web/eastrussia.ru/public_html/gtranslate/gtranslate.php on line 101
Third essay by Leonid Blyakher on the development of Far Eastern business: vertical race - EastRussia | Opinions

Irkutsk
Ulan-Ude

Blagoveshchensk
Chita
Yakutsk

Birobidzhan
Vladivostok
Khabarovsk

Magadan
Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk

Anadyr
Petropavlovsk-
Kamchatsky
Moscow

This text is translated into Russian by google automatic human level neural machine.
EastRussia is not responsible for any mistakes in the translated text. Sorry for the inconvinience.
Please refer to the text in Russian as a source.

Who are the Far Eastern entrepreneurs-3

Sketch of the third Leonid Blyakher on the formation of Far Eastern entrepreneurship: vertical race

Who are the Far Eastern entrepreneurs-3
Photo by seanholman.com

Leonid Blyakher

Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy and Culturology of the Pacific State University, Doctor of Philosophy
The situation in the regional business begins to change radically in the middle of the "zero" years. The "rules of the game" that have been established for decades are declared "corruption". A furious struggle with them begins. The former power entrepreneurs gradually take away the bulk of the powers. Until the end of the "zero" years, the struggle was with varying success. After all, this very "corruption" created in the region dozens, if not hundreds of thousands of jobs, fed whole regions and regions. This includes the import and maintenance of second-hand foreign cars in Primorye, "gray" fishing in Kamchatka and Sakhalin, "black loggers" in the Khabarovsk Territory, etc.

But in the end, the "center" wins a complete victory. The reason is simple. He offers regional business a replacement for all these extremely risky activities - participation in government projects that are funded in one way or another from the budget. That is, the forms of financing could be different. These were not necessarily direct budget investments. State monopolies and their subsidiaries, All-Russian holdings, etc. were invested. One thing was common - all these investments in regional projects were planned and carried out in the capital's corridors of power. These funds were not just a lot, but many times more than the regional economy could offer even in the best years. As businessmen are rational people, regional business, moreover, having lost support “on the ground”, begins to reorient itself from independent navigation to participate in projects initiated by the state (“on a budget”).

They are oriented in different ways. Someone (units), "merged" into vertically integrated holdings, directly participates in state megaprojects (reconstruction of Vladivostok, construction of gas and oil pipelines of the ESPO system, reconstruction of the Far Eastern Railway and others). Someone gets the opportunity to "service" enterprises with state order. There are many options. But they have a common - they all focus on resources flowing from the center to the region, distributed beyond its borders. An attempt to "redirect" financial flows from megaprojects to regional needs in the usual way leads to the first wave of "planting" in the region.

It becomes clear that it is now possible to "buy" the opportunity to "live by the law" not in the governor's "retail", but only in the only metropolitan "supermarket". In the same "supermarket" (ministries, state monopolies, presidential administration, etc.), you can get a regional order. Accordingly, living in the region ceases to be a condition for the existence of a regional business. Much more effective, his problems can be solved in the capitals. The interest of businesses in investing in the infrastructure of the region is diminishing, and the possibility of regional authorities to initiate such an interest. The largest representatives of regional business are beginning to leave the region.

As regional business appears to be only representative of the capital enterprise in the region, trust between the capital and local leaders also disappears. To the capital money is not stolen, numerous controllers are in the region. Cumbersome reporting systems of "local" entrepreneurs are created before their metropolitan patrons. Equally, if not more tightly "overlaid" by the regional authorities. Sharply increases the costs of any public activity, while compensated by "right" entrepreneurs through new budget injections.

To replace managers who try to maximize the profit of their enterprise, there comes a generation of "cost managers" who effectively manage ... losses. That is, those who are able to shift the losses of the enterprise to a budget of one level or another. To be profitable in the new conditions becomes deadly dangerous. After all, this is a clear "corruption." Much more effective is the mechanical execution of all the rules in order to get a reward for it, compensating for the costs associated with their execution.



The fall in private investment in the social infrastructure of the region in that very recent period is compensated by the growing activity of state social policy. Actually, this is the main task of governors and mayors. Of course, they are habitually "asked" for politics and for the economy, but the real function is only the distribution of funds received from the federal budget for social items: medicine, education, improvement, etc. In politics and the economy of the region, they already "do not rule" . But around these programs (the construction of social housing, the maintenance of educational institutions and health care facilities), there is a kind of business. After all, someone has to build, plant, service hospital complexes and kindergartens.

In the "tenth" years, the number of inspectors in the Far East continues to grow. The logic is clear. After all, the controller can also "bribe". So, we need controllers over controllers and so on ad infinitum. It is not by chance that the number of such controllers (from internal auditors to the prosecutor's office) is approaching in the Khabarovsk and Primorye Territories to a tenth of the total able-bodied population. But, among other things, these are people with large salaries, which means, with a high level of consumption. Maintenance of this consumption is a separate direction of entrepreneurship of the "tenth" years. In the regional capitals, expensive restaurants and car dealerships, boutiques and fitness clubs are opened. There is much that opens. But all these blessings and blessings are held only on powerful flows flowing into the region from the outside. And to the last years these streams start to diminish, disappear.

It is then that it becomes clear that there is no “independent” business, at least in the legal space. All of it, one way or another, is tied to budgetary or near budget resources. Entrepreneurship begins to rapidly roll up. The gigantic costs of legality are no longer compensated by equally gigantic “buns” from the state or its agents. Back to the regional economy of the end 90-x does not allow superdense control. After all, the controllers of the most different directions have already realized their interests. The battle for the preservation of the entire cumbersome system of control (the fight against corruption) for them and acts as a battle for the preservation of their jobs, salaries, status.

Numerous programs for the development of small and not very small businesses, presented by the authorities of various levels, are increasingly turning into fairy tales and legends, which are not believed not only by business but also by the developers themselves. And business goes "into the cache", disappears, dissolves "in the shadows," runs from the vastly inhospitable Far Eastern open spaces. The richest region is slowly and gradually plunged into depression, emptying.

Is there an exit? Oh sure. And, the simplest thing is to stop developing and controlling the Far East from the beautiful far away, to let its inhabitants "loose bread". At the same time, you must create a sphere where you can move controllers. Sphere, where they will be, if not useful to the region, then at least the least harmful. Without this, alas, today not only development, but even survival is difficult. Of course, the inspectors can also degrade themselves, as government funding decreases. It was already at the end of 80-x - the beginning of 90-ies of the last century. Only it will be long and painful. We can not live.