Notice: curl_setopt(): CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST no longer accepts the value 1, value 2 will be used instead in /home/admin/web/ on line 101
Leonid Blyakher: the Far East goes into the shadow - EastRussia | Opinions






This text is translated into Russian by google automatic human level neural machine.
EastRussia is not responsible for any mistakes in the translated text. Sorry for the inconvinience.
Please refer to the text in Russian as a source.

On the growth of gray and lack of whiteness

A series of essays on how the future in the Russian Far East is planned and implemented. Essay 2

On the growth of gray and lack of whiteness
Photo: shutterstock

Leonid Blyakher

Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy and Culturology of the Pacific State University, Doctor of Philosophy
In one of the responses to previous essays The desire to "add figures" was expressed. This is where the problem arises. For today, with the exception of geographical parameters, "figures about the Far East", to put it mildly, are approximate enough. If we add data on the population by municipalities, then we will not get data for the region. The data on ATC and the migration service differ, and they do not completely coincide with the data of selective studies given by election commissions. Somewhere in the number of residents include temporary workers, they are excluded somewhere. Somewhere even the dead and the crews of ships that have long since replaced their work place continue to figure in the databases. And this is the most important parameter - for the population of the region. The same picture for the number of enterprises, according to their profile, in terms of investment. Such differences (related to the banal circumstance that statistics become an element of PR and adjusted to "reporting indicators"), among other things, indicates that the region is slowly but surely turning into an "unknown land". Simply put, we do not know in which region we live. More precisely, bureaucratic knowledge of the region is entering an increasingly obvious contradiction with what the people see outside the window. That's what the residents see outside the window, and I'm trying to learn.

In part, the residents themselves work for this. They are increasingly less eager to be "visible" to the authorities. Reducing the golden rain from the budget without significantly reducing the tasks for the development of the region, the implementation of "active social policy", etc. Lead to the fact that the burden on legal business is constantly growing. This is not only taxes, although their growth also takes place. These are numerous "encumbrances" of state and municipal projects. These are fines, which, according to informants, are quite comparable in volume and regularity with taxes. This is a "social responsibility", the volume of which also continues to grow.

But the profitability of enterprises "of the tenth years" is no longer in any comparison with the previous period. Double-digit figures in percentages of income are in the past. Increasing pressure on regional businesses reduces its motivation to be visible. This motivation is further reduced due to changes in the conditions for participation in state or municipal projects. It is important not only that the orders themselves have become smaller (there is no significant reduction yet). It is significant that participation in them for business is becoming less profitable. State, municipal, budgetary and other institutions, too, go into a saving mode, trying to get from potential performers as much as possible for less money. But it was participation in these projects that was the main motive for legalization in the previous period.

The "shadow" in business is slowly but surely increasing. "White" business is increasingly becoming "gray" or just ending, and its leaders go to officials, move to Thailand or Macao. Reducing the number of "white" enterprises leads to an increase in the burden on the remaining. After all, the tasks of regional authorities were not reduced. This gives a new impetus to movement in the "shadow". But for the "gray" business to exist, we need equally "gray" workers. Where do they come from in the conditions of continuing outflow of population? Here the most interesting begins.

At 2015 / 2016, with the support of the Khamovniki Foundation, I conducted a small study in the cities of the Khabarovsk Territory for the prevalence of "shadow employment". As a result, it turned out that more than 44% of respondents (sample territorial, the general population - the adult population of the Khabarovsk Territory) have additional employment. And for almost a third of them, this employment is the determining factor for the family budget. These are completely ordinary workers, clerks, teachers and doctors, who, as they say in the old joke, "sew in the evening a little at home." They make details of the furniture that is in our apartments. Cakes are prepared for birthdays and weddings, patties for pit stops. They sew and repair, give lessons and put injections, take care of children and old people, fish and breed cattle, build houses and dig wells, take pictures and make films. A lot of things they do.

The forms of employment are very different. Someone works for themselves. Someone works for a close or remote customer. It is important that all this happens in a "shadow" and is not visible to the state. At some point the state discovers not that the shadow itself, but some indistinct understanding that in reality everything is somehow not as it is in reality. And like every state, it rushes to search for those who have escaped from the all-seeing eye.

But this noble desire to control everything and everything suddenly comes across a material problem. The resources needed to detect a "shadow business" need just as much as to test a large plant. The income of the main mass of shadow businesses is not particularly great. In the interview, informants talked about incomes from thirty to one hundred thousand rubles a month. You can live on it. But it's hard for someone else to "warm up" on this. As a result, the "revenues" from the activities of numerous inspectors are much less than the costs of their salaries. Such results before the authorities do not report. This significantly reduces the motivation of supervisors to "catch" "gray" entrepreneurs.

And the shadow grows. So far this is not the whole reality. After all, salaries are paid (although the word "delays" has already appeared), some projects are being implemented, some money is being paid. Controllers, so far as they are supposed to, control everything or are eager to do it. But the trend of movement in the "shadow" is already quite palpable. What are the consequences of this? It seems to me that it is not catastrophic at all. And, of course, not tomorrow. But about these consequences it makes sense to say specifically. It is not just the form of people's survival in the region that changes (only in the region?). The way of interaction between man and the state is changing. Of course, I'm not Vanga or even Globa. Visions are rarely visited, and only at high temperatures. But I will try to build a forecast based on existing trends. This will be discussed in the next essay.