This text is translated into Russian by google automatic human level neural machine.
EastRussia is not responsible for any mistakes in the translated text. Sorry for the inconvinience.
Please refer to the text in Russian as a source.
I need to talk
Leonid Blyakher on what was not discussed at the fourth WEF
The fourth Eastern Economic Forum has already been held. Passed more than successfully. Six thousand participants, leaders of all major countries and economies of the region - is this not an indicator? In addition to the usual "protocols of intent" at the forum were real investment agreements on huge amounts. Under the forum were reports on the development of the Far East of Russia. The growth rate of the economy in the region is twice as high as in the whole country, and in a number of industries even higher. In a word, the region has two main states - "very good" and "for the present it's just good". And, surprisingly, it's all true.
Leonid Blyakher Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy and Culturology of the Pacific State University, Doctor of Philosophy
And prices in a dynamically developing region, indeed, are not encouraging. When Moscow or Paris is called "expensive cities", a resident of Yakutsk or Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky can only smile sadly. And to the inhabitant of the future global city of Vladivostok, constantly "interfering" with carrying out of the next major event by the fact of the existence - only it is abysmally to give up a hand.
All this, most likely, little things, the costs of growth. After all, in our Far Eastern apartment there is a big repair. It is clear that in the conditions of the removed parquet and torn wallpaper is not very comfortable to live. Then, when the repair is over .... But there is something else. A kind of not quite intelligible message coming from those very outskirts of a dynamically developing and developing region. Such a feeling that there, behind the facade of development, there lived and still lives a different reality.
The one that caught fish, drove and repaired cars, chopped wood, mined gold and diamonds. In a word, I once lived. In this reality, without a pomp, but without state supervision, hospitals and schools, roads and junctions were built, newspapers, radio and television worked, jazz and rock festivals were held. A lot of that was there. In it, in this reality the Far East lived for decades. The idea of "developing the Far East" was perceived by the Far East as the idea of helping them in their, this, understandable and familiar life.
But everything turned out to be quite different. The country needs (and it already seems, no one disputes) to enter the East, the gateway to the world of Asia, increasingly turning from the outskirts of the world into its center. All the activities that fed the Far East for decades suddenly became not very interesting, and some were simply declared "harmful." And without that the reality of the lives of millions of Far Easterners, which did not aspire to publicity, turned into "invisibility." Being "invisible", she could not even find a word to say about what she was not happy with. To say that hundreds of thousands of jobs have disappeared, and dozens appeared at best, that the fate of thousands and thousands of Far Easterners was blown up by the locomotive of social progress. There were no words for those who by profession should express public opinion. These words simply were not there.
Local reality has gone to the periphery, turning into a parallel world, a small life. Like the one described by Ilf and Petrov in The Golden Calf: "In parallel to the big world in which big people and big things live, there is a small world with small people and small things."
But the problem is that it is in this "little life" that we live and, as it is not strange, most often do not fall into ecstasy from what she (our reality) was sacrificed. They sacrificed not for malice, but simply because they did not know about it, each time sincerely surprised when some "parallel" meaning broke through to the surface, seeing in it a "habit of whining" when "it is necessary to work". The fact that for the addressee (Far East) this is heard and perceived as: "Work, work, the sun is still high ...", apparently, is not realized.
Is there any logic and, sorry for the pathos, the truth in the words and actions of the progressors from the beautiful far? Certainly. It is in the East and the South today that Russia's future is laid, and its chance for prosperity is created. That's why bridges and roads, warehouses and airports, sea terminals and ice class vessels, TORs and Free Ports are needed. But there is no less truth in the "whining" of the Far East. They live here and, as it is not criminal and shameful, want to live well. So, as they are able, and not as planned progressors. But if "big reality" sounds from all irons, the little one lurks on the benches at the entrances, in bus conversations, showing up in the "unexpected" results of the elections, in the ongoing departure.
Even the most critical journalists write about the fact that this or that project is "not needed" or "badly implemented." But the problem is not that. Two realities that could and should strengthen each other (who knows the East of Asia better than the Far East?) Do not see each other, carefully do not notice one another.
Is there a way out?
Reasonable people can always agree to mutual benefit. It's enough just to create a platform where a big and small reality can meet, see each other and talk not in the language of mutual accusations.
Is this possible?
I think yes. And then at the next VEF, the reality of the Far East will be discussed not in place of, but along with the reality of "big people" within the framework of one common reality - Russia.