Notice: curl_setopt(): CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST no longer accepts the value 1, value 2 will be used instead in /home/admin/web/eastrussia.ru/public_html/gtranslate/gtranslate.php on line 101
Accounts Chamber: RusHydro did not commission energy facilities in the Far East on time - EastRussia | Far East

Irkutsk
Ulan-Ude

Blagoveshchensk
Chita
Yakutsk

Birobidzhan
Vladivostok
Khabarovsk

Magadan
Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk

Anadyr
Petropavlovsk-
Kamchatsky
Moscow

This text is translated into Russian by google automatic human level neural machine.
EastRussia is not responsible for any mistakes in the translated text. Sorry for the inconvinience.
Please refer to the text in Russian as a source.

Accounts Chamber: RusHydro did not commission power facilities in the Far East on time

The Accounts Chamber of Russia discovered that the deadlines for the commissioning of two power facilities in the Far East on the part of RusHydro PJSC, the first phase of the Sakhalin GRES-2 and CHP in Sovetskaya Gavan, were not met. According to the auditors, the company is not fulfilling its obligations under the agreement on the provision of budgetary investments.

The first phase of the Sakhalin GRES-2 should have been put into operation in the second half of the year 2018. The failure of the deadlines, according to Oleg Chernyavsky, Director of the Accounts Chamber, was mainly due to violations during the trial launch of equipment in October last year. They resulted in significant damage to the steam boiler. In addition, the deadlines for the construction of off-site infrastructure were also violated.

According to the deputy general director of RusHydro for capital construction, Nikolay Karpukhin, the station is now ready for 97%, they plan to put it into operation in June. But with the CHP in Sovgavani terms are not so bright. According to the press service of the Accounts Chamber, this object should have been completed this year, however, by 31 December 2018, the station was only ready for 48,3%.

The ministry also found that in the second half of 2018, the marginal estimated cost of construction of facilities increased. This happened after the adjustment of project documentation under the supplementary agreement on the provision of budget investments. The cost of the project was influenced by new technical solutions, which had to be taken due to the replacement of imported equipment with domestic ones, as well as due to the low quality of survey work - the design did not take into account the seismicity of the regions.